Civil conflicts gravely damage the state’s legitimacy. Institutions are rendered incapable of providing security; social trust among its citizenry diminishes; and non-state actors step in to fill the vacuum of power. Following conflict, the state needs to re-establish itself as the legitimate arbiter of processes aimed at bringing former rebel collaborators to justice. Unless it carefully considers subnational variation in the drivers of forgiveness and reconciliation with rebel collaborators, the state may generate new grievances among some communities, increasing the chances of rebel recidivism or the outbreak of new conflict. This project develops and tests a novel framework integrating political science theories of legitimacy with psychological theories of forgiveness, feelings of (in)justice and desire for revenge. To test this framework, we conduct in-depth interviews, hold focus groups and implement three large-scale surveys with embedded experiments (N=3,600) in Iraq, a country that has endured a series of civil conflicts culminating in the recent confrontation with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). This project employs innovative tools to identify both the subnational drivers of violent resentment towards the state and the drivers of reconciliation. It provides policymakers with the information necessary to design successful strategies for reconciliation, re-establishment of state legitimacy, and lasting peace. Principal Investigator with participating researchers Michael Bang Petersen and Kristin Fabbe. Funded by Risksbanken Jubileumsfond.
Attitudes Toward Islamic State Returnees to Europe, Gothenburg, Sweden, Vetenskapsfestivalen (Public Science Fair), 2020
Most of the thousands of European citizens who traveled to Iraq and Syria to join the Islamic State (IS) now seek repatriation and reintegration into their home communities. This project seeks to understand the conditions under which Europeans view punishment of IS collaborators as fair. Can state-imposed punishments or rehabilitative measures contribute to reconciliation? Or should such transgressions result in the loss of citizenship for these Europeans, as some policymakers are promoting? This project develops and tests a novel framework integrating political theories of state legitimacy with psychological theories of (in)justice, retribution, and forgiveness. To test this framework, we will run a booth at Gothenburg’s Vetenskapsfestivalen on April 21-26, 2020 in Nordstan. The site attracts 100,000 visitors a day, providing a good venue for obtaining many responses from a broad variety of Swedish residents. We propose to employ conjoint experiments embedded within a survey to identify drivers of desire for retribution or reconciliation across different sectors of the population (e.g., migrants, religion). These experiments will also allow us to test the effects of misalignments between punishments that Swedes see as just and those that the state may implement on willingness to forgive criminals. This project will provide policymakers with information needed to create a safe and inclusive Swedish society. With Peter Esaiasson and Mattias Ågerberg.